Education

Parent Opposed To ‘Race-Based’ Admissions Scores Massive Legal Victory After Being Criminally Charged

A Virginia parent won a legal victory when a Fairfax County judge dismissed four charges of libel and slander with prejudice Friday.

Harry Jackson, a former PTA president of Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology who opposed changes to the school’s admissions policy, was facing libel and slander charges in the wake of claiming that a proponent of the new admissions policies exhibited “grooming behavior” on social media. The new policies, which critics have characterized as “race-based,” eliminated standardized testing requirements and were found by a federal judge to discriminate against Asian Americans.

“It was a great day for parents maintaining their right to free speech and if they see something of concern when it comes to child safety, to say something without fear of reprisal,” Jackson told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Harry Jackson’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice — the 4 criminal charges of “slander” for calling out on Twitter and YouTube the “grooming behavior” of an adult’s interaction with minors —GRANTED‼️

Fairfax, VA pic.twitter.com/m52u5gqnSq

— Marina Medvin 🇺🇸 (@MarinaMedvin) April 8, 2022

A lawsuit against Fairfax County Public Schools that includes Jackson as a plaintiff seeks to strike down the new admissions policies as being race-based. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently granted a stay in the case that allows the current admissions policy to remain in place.

Jorge Torrico, a member of the TJ Alumni Action Group, an advocacy group who favored the changes to the admissions process, alleged to the Fairfax County Magistrate that Jackson violated Virginia’s criminal libel and slander law by making the “grooming behavior” claims, according to legal documents.

Fairfax County Commonwealth Attorney Steve Descano’s office sought to drop prosecution Thursday, but Jackson’s attorney, Marina Medvin, objected and instead filed a motion to have the charges dismissed with prejudice.

“The judge did not reach the constitutional issues of the statute that was used to charge the ‘grooming’ words,” Medvin tweeted.

The judge did not reach the constitutional issues of the statute that was used to charge the “grooming” words.

We will have to fight this statute in the VA legislature.

Keep your eyes on @NickForVA.

— Marina Medvin 🇺🇸 (@MarinaMedvin) April 8, 2022

“This is an important victory for not just Harry Jackson but also parents and journalists everywhere,” Asra Nomani, a co-founder of Coalition for TJ, told the DCNF. “A woke activist used a little-used statute to criminalize speech and prosecutor Steve Descano allowed this harassment to hang over Harry’s head for months.”

“I believe this dismissal, coupled with the publicity from this case, will hopefully restore the public’s trust in the First Amendment,” Medvin told the DCNF. “Nonetheless, my work is not done. My next project is to get this law off the books. Next stop is Richmond.”

The Fairfax County Commonwealth Attorney’s Office did not respond to a request for comment from the DCNF.