
Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons
Republicans spent over $5 billion to win the Midterm elections, although money could not save them from the political “headwinds” they faced.
A historic $12 billion was spent on political advertising in the 2026 midterms, with Republicans spending $5.45 billion and Democrats spending $5.02 billion, according to AdImpact. Despite the spending advantage, Democrats reclaimed majorities in both chambers of Congress after securing historic wins in historically red states and districts.
Travis Trawick, the founder and CEO of FullPAC GOTV, told the Daily Caller News Foundation that the record-advertisement spending failed due to voters’ frustrations with the economy and government corruption.
“Money’s great when you have some wind in your sails, but when you have nothing but headwinds, it can’t really do anything for you,” Trawick told the DCNF. “I don’t think an infinite amount of money would have allowed them to overcome the obstacles in this election.”
Trawick argued that ads were not going to change voters’ minds on high gas prices or the Iran war. Exit polls showed that voters soured on President Donald Trump’s handling of the conflict and the economy, prompting Latino voters and young men to shift toward Democrats.
While political advertisements remain very effective for messaging, Republicans were not able to use ads to their advantage because of their unpopularity, Trawick said. They were able to spend their money more efficiently on more competitive races, including Michigan and Maine, because they were in a better place politically.
The Texas race topped $500 million in advertisement spending, making it the most expensive non-presidential U.S. election in history. Republicans spent over $274 million on ads in Texas, while Democrats spent about $133 million, according to AdImpact. They increased their spending in Texas while pulling money away from battleground states such as North Carolina and Georgia.
Republicans were unable to spend their money efficiently because they were losing support in every competitive race in the U.S.
“Democrats, because they had such a good lead and good standing going into this election, they were able to spend there money more efficiently on some of these competitive races,” Trawick said. “Where the Republican, they, instead of conceding that they were going to be losing the House, losing the Senate, losing some of these top races and consolidating some of their spending in the places that they could try to protect, they spread out thin, and the Democrats were able to really target their advertising to the places like Texas and Georgia that allowed them to flip some of these votes and actually have a massive win on Election Day.”
“That’s really kind of the whole basis is Republicans were not able to spend their money in the right places because they were spread thin because they were losing ground everywhere,” Trawick continued.
Democratic Texas Sen.-elect James Talarico released advertisements angled around Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s alleged corruption.
“The two top issues that we pulled on this entire cycle by a wide margin was number one, cost of living, and number two, clean government. [Talarico] did a fantastic fundraising funnel from small donors, being able to get people motivated even way outside of Texas,” Trawick said. “He’s been raising money from all 50 states, and being able to do that from a small donor network just makes a big impact and being able to fund your campaign and talk about the issues that matter.”
Paxton was accused of misusing the office of the attorney general to protect and assist Austin real estate developer and political donor Nate Paul, who faced federal investigations, by allegedly intervening in lawsuits, issuing favorable legal opinions to protect Paul’s properties and hiring a special prosecutor to investigate claims helpful to Paul.
The Republican-controlled Texas state Legislature impeached Paxton in 2023 on bribery and abuse of power charges, although the state Senate acquitted him.
Paxton’s team attacked Talarico’s past statements on Christianity by showing an AI-generated Talarico defacing a Bible with a crayon and saying, “In the beginning God was non-binary, and he wasn’t a Christian. And God said, ‘let there be six genders,’ and there were.”
Talarico previously said God was “non-binary” and that the story of Jesus’ conception proves the Bible supports bodily autonomy. He called Jesus a “radical feminist” and that He has helped him “reckon with [his] own whiteness.”
Democratic advisers aired 28,000 broadcast spots attacking Paxton over corruption, according to AdImpact. Republicans attacked Talarico over transgender issues, crime and taxation. Over 31% of ads during the 2026 cycle mentioned either ethics or campaign finance, a record high since 2012, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.
Many ads in Kansas attacked Republican Kansas Sen. Roger Marshall for suing over 700 patients for outstanding debt, including new mothers, during his time as an OB-GYN. Marshall ignored his team’s advice and put out a self-directed ad addressing the attacks.
In Michigan, a Republican-aligned super PAC released an ad depicting Democratic Michigan Sen.-elect Abdul El-Sayed playing a game of cards referencing “Death to America” and 9/11.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk spent roughly $224 million in Texas to back Republican candidates, including Paxton and Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. Abbott lost his race to Democratic Texas Gov.-elect Gina Hinojosa. Several of Musk’s businesses are headquartered in Texas, including SpaceX and Tesla.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].