No featured image available
President Joe Biden’s nominee to fill the empty seat on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has a history of opposing immigration authorities’ use of data to enforce the law.
Alvaro Bedoya, a Georgetown Law professor and privacy advocate who is scheduled to have his committee nomination hearing Wednesday, is a staunch proponent of limiting the ability of immigration agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to collect and use data to facilitate deportations of illegal immigrants. Bedoya has criticized private companies that provide immigration agencies with citizens’ data.
“It is time to call ICE what it is: An out-of-control domestic surveillance agency that peers into all our lives,” Bedoya tweeted in February, calling for stronger privacy laws to “rein in data brokers.”
While federal data privacy legislation has thus far failed to gain traction in Congress, Democrats have looked to the FTC to begin a privacy rulemaking process under existing legislation. Democratic Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal led top Senate Democrats in writing a letter to Lina Khan, the FTC chair, urging use of the agency strengthen data privacy protections. The Build Back Back Better Act allocates $500 million for a new “privacy bureau” within the FTC tasked with implementing and enforcing data protections.
If confirmed, Bedoya will oversee the enforcement of privacy laws as well as the creation of new data protections the FTC is reportedly considering. This position would offer Bedoya considerable latitude to regulate how data companies collect and share information.
In a column for Slate written in September 2020, Bedoya targeted data analytics company Palantir and its relationship with ICE as a reason for new legal protections on data privacy.
Palantir’s “leadership has decided that the cost of its work for ICE is de minimis, that in the eyes of its clients and the investing public it simply does not matter,” Bedoya wrote. “As a Latino and an immigrant, I worry that on this point they will be right.”
Bedoya pointed to the fact that Palantir’s technology assists ICE agents in accessing different databases, building profiles, visualizing data and connecting data sources as an example of a practice harming illegal immigrants.
“Much of my work focuses on how surveillance affects immigrants and people of color,” Bedoya wrote. “Yet, even for me, it is hard to see the technology behind ICE’s brutality.”
Bedoya previously advocated for enlarging and empowering the FTC as a tool to combat data collection and consumer surveillance, pointing to the harms caused by “companies that track us to identify our weaknesses.”
“Surveillance isn’t a question of cookies on browsers. It’s a question of life or death,” Bedoya said in a call-to-action video with OpenMic. “It’s a question of, can you explore your sexuality in peace and without other people looking over your shoulder? It’s a question of whether you can stay in this country if you’re undocumented.”
Bedoya has also opposed the collaboration of state agencies and local law enforcement agencies with ICE, calling on such authorities to refuse to share data with the agency.
If confirmed, Bedoya would hand the Democrats a 3-2 majority in the FTC. Bedoya declined to comment when reached by the Daily Caller News Foundation.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].