Energy

2020 Hopeful Jay Inslee Takes Heat For His Climate Change Agenda

Snow scene (By Psy guy - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=533690)

• A Washington state lawmaker is going after 2020 hopeful Jay Inslee over what his spokesman recently said.
• Inslee’s spokesman said the governor ‘led opposition to oil and coal export terminals.’
• That contradicted what state officials said when rejecting those terminals and the jobs they would have created.

Washington Governor Jay Inslee’s spokesman may have created some complications for the Democratic 2020 hopeful by painting him as a leader in killing coal and oil export terminals planned along the west coast.

That set off alarm bells for Washington state Rep. Jim Walsh, a Republican, who said it contradicted the Inslee administration’s claim they followed “the letter and spirit of the law in reviewing critical infrastructure projects,” like coal export terminals.

That includes Washington state’s high-profile rejection the Millennium Bulk Terminals’ proposal to build the largest coal export terminal in the U.S., which would have been in Walsh’s district. Inslee critics at the time saw it as part of the governor’s climate, anti-fossil fuels agenda.

“Now, a boastful quote in an industry trade magazine confirms what many of us have suspected,” Walsh told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“Governor Inslee — and not some faceless bureaucrat — played a direct role in subverting our regulations with the explicit goal of denying any project that didn’t adhere to his political agenda,” Walsh said of the state’s 2017 decision.

Walsh was reacting to recent comments by Inslee spokesman Jamal Raad, who in January touted the governor’s climate credentials to E&E News, including “noting he has led opposition to oil and coal export terminals proposed for the Washington coast.”

To Walsh and other critics, Raad’s comments suggest Inslee meddling in the state’s decision to reject the Millennium terminal and other coal and oil export projects.

Raad’s remarks were meant to fend off criticisms that Inslee, who may run as the “climate candidate” in 2020, has largely failed to implement climate policies championed by the left despite governing a blue state.

“The governor has been in this fight for a long time and is willing to take on fights versus the most powerful interests in the world,” Raad told E&E News. “This is not easy. If it were easy, it would have been solved a long time ago. It is going to take people who are willing to take on these fights. That’s what the governor’s done and will continue to do.”

Washington state officials denied a Clean Water Act permit to build the Millennium terminal, which would have shipped 44 million tons of coal annually to customers in Asia and provide a vital lifeline to Montana’s struggling coal industry.

Washington’s Department of Ecology Director Maia Bellon, however, said the project presented “too many unavoidable and negative environmental effects” to warrant approval.

Millennium’s developer, Lighthouse Resources, quickly filed suit against the state alleging a “biased and prejudiced decision-making” process. However, Bellon said the decision by-the-book and not political.

“I feel very strongly that is a solid decision and feel in no way that it was arbitrary,” Bellon said of the state’s decision to block the Millennium terminal. A federal judge dismissed the Millennium lawsuit late last year.

“The governor’s latest talking point is a slap in the face to the thousands of hard-working individuals in southwestern Washington who need projects like Millennium to feed their families and pay their bills,” Walsh said.

“We now know Inslee lied as he looks to boost his profile and presidential ambitions,” Walsh added.

Inslee’s office told TheDCNF they were “confident in the process that the Washington State Department of Ecology is engaged in” to reject the Millennium and other terminals. Spokeswoman Tara Lee also said Raad represented Inslee’s political campaign, not his state office.

“The spokesperson was on the political side of the governor’s operations, not related to the communications team in the Office of the Governor,” Lee told TheDCNF.

Not all Inslee’s critics agreed with Walsh’s assessment of the situation, but agreed the Department of Ecology’s rejection of the Millennium terminal was biased and based on politics, not science.

“It’s very clear the decision was arbitrary,” said Todd Myers, environment director at the free-market Washington Policy Center. “It’s obvious because they made up an entirely new standard that doesn’t apply anywhere else in the world.”

Myers said Inslee’s administration made Millennium jump through hoops that no other project had to in order to get a water quality permit. For example, state regulators took into account things that had nothing to do with local water quality, including global emissions from coal combusted in Asia.

On the other hand, Myers noted, state regulators do not make Boeing account for the global impacts of its airplanes, nor do they ask Amazon for a carbon accounting of the fuel it uses to deliver packages around the world.

“When the governor is given a choice between Seattle environmentalists and working people, he chooses the environmentalists,” Myers told TheDCNF. “This is about politics, not science.”

Adam Davis, business agent for the local plumbers and pipefitters union in Longview, agreed the process “lengthy and biased permitting process” to block the Millennium terminal.

“I deal with folks on a daily basis on the road because they can’t get work,” Davis told TheDCNF. “I know that my membership is not happy with a lot of what’s happened.”

Davis said his union supported Inslee in his gubernatorial bid in 2013, but he’s not sure they will support Inslee’s re-election bid or even a potential presidential run.

“If he continues to send the message that he’s the climate change candidate, given what we’ve seen here, it’s probably not something we’d support,” Davis said.

Follow Michael on Twitter